Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:25:22 -0700 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... Message-ID: <2BAC3B24-35AF-4505-89D7-E1A4B0B24E93@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-9-206728749 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:37 PM, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > > I'm running a small and a large version of the program (wrt memory > requirements and run-time). The average execution time for the small > version goes from ~200'' under win32, to ~220'' under linux, and to > ~800'' under freebsd. For the large version, the numbers are ~1600'' > for win32, ~1800'' for linux, and ~4700'' for freebsd. > > This is all on a 1.7GHz Pentium-M laptop with 1G RAM (dmesg at > http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/Computers/dmesgs/ace.dmesg), running - > current > as of Sep 29. The JDKs tested are diablo-jdk15 (1.5.0.07.01) and > sun-jdk15 (1.5.0p6) for FreeBSD, and sun-jdk15 (1.5.0_07) for linux > and > win32. My Java 1.4.2 in FreeBSD was only slightly slower than sun java 1.4.2 on linux and slightly more slower than on Solaris 10, but not at all by the margins you mention. Just a point of reference. The java I was running was some compute intensive "benchmarks" and some production web app (WebObjects) code. I have not yet built a 1.5 on FreeBSD. I am on a server only, no display, so I have been building my own and not using the diablo stuff at all. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net --Apple-Mail-9-206728749--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2BAC3B24-35AF-4505-89D7-E1A4B0B24E93>