From owner-freebsd-cluster Sat Jan 6 16:58:41 2001 From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 6 16:58:25 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from acl.lanl.gov (acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A677C37B402; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:58:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mini.acl.lanl.gov (root@mini.acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.34]) by acl.lanl.gov (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA4385659; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 17:58:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (rminnich@localhost) by mini.acl.lanl.gov (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA15100; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 17:58:24 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: mini.acl.lanl.gov: rminnich owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 17:58:23 -0700 (MST) From: Ronald G Minnich X-Sender: rminnich@mini.acl.lanl.gov To: Robert Watson Cc: jasone@FreeBSD.ORG, cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Decomposition of "process" -- will it be possible to have unbacked procs? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I strongly recommend before you go this direction that you check out the way Plan 9 processes work. It's quite beautiful, since the operations on remote and local processes all work the exact same way. ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message