Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jul 2001 07:22:25 +1000
From:      Greg Black <gjb@gbch.net>
To:        Sung Nae Cho <sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Is FreeBSD more secure than Windows NT or Windows 2000? 
Message-ID:  <nospam-995750546.49223@maxim.gbch.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107211603390.7440-100000@quasar.phys.vt.edu>  of Sat, 21 Jul 2001 16:08:53 -0400
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107211603390.7440-100000@quasar.phys.vt.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sung Nae Cho wrote:

| Thank you all for your generous info on encryption.  Hmmm, now I don't
| know what Microsoft actually meant when they advertised Windows NT, 2000
| was "Truly Secure"!

They lied -- as they normally do in the interest of making a
sale to an uninformed user.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?nospam-995750546.49223>