Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:40:32 +0200
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        mike <mike503@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Thinking of using ZFS/FBSD for a backup system
Message-ID:  <4873ECE0.5090706@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <bd9320b30807081531x4ba92c92lbcfcbeba059237af@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <bd9320b30807072315x105cf058tf9f952f0f5bb2a6a@mail.gmail.com>	<20080708100701.57031cda@twoflower.in.publishing.hu>	<bd9320b30807080131j5e0e02a4y3231d7bfa1738517@mail.gmail.com>	<4873C4FA.2020004@FreeBSD.org> <4873E068.8060305@psg.com>	<4873E0AE.6090305@psg.com> <bd9320b30807081531x4ba92c92lbcfcbeba059237af@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mike wrote:
> On 7/8/08, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
>> <sigh>.  first cuppa.  it's 4g
> 
> okay, so it sounds like from multiple people this could be doable and
> stable enough:
> 
> dual or quad-core current gen processor (amd64)
> 4g ram
> 4 or 6x 1tb disks
> freebsd 7.0-release
> 
> these tweaks to /boot/loader.conf:
> 
> vm.kmem_size=600M
> vm.kmem_size_max=600M
> vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1
> 
> right?

Might be enough kmem, if not, or if you want better performance from 
increased caching, increase as high as 1500M

Kris




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4873ECE0.5090706>