From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 22:40:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29964106567B for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:40:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682F98FC19; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4873ECE0.5090706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:40:32 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mike References: <20080708100701.57031cda@twoflower.in.publishing.hu> <4873C4FA.2020004@FreeBSD.org> <4873E068.8060305@psg.com> <4873E0AE.6090305@psg.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thinking of using ZFS/FBSD for a backup system X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:40:28 -0000 mike wrote: > On 7/8/08, Randy Bush wrote: > >> . first cuppa. it's 4g > > okay, so it sounds like from multiple people this could be doable and > stable enough: > > dual or quad-core current gen processor (amd64) > 4g ram > 4 or 6x 1tb disks > freebsd 7.0-release > > these tweaks to /boot/loader.conf: > > vm.kmem_size=600M > vm.kmem_size_max=600M > vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1 > > right? Might be enough kmem, if not, or if you want better performance from increased caching, increase as high as 1500M Kris