From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Aug 16 20:13:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA02332 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 16 Aug 1998 20:13:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from yunus.ms.washington.edu (yunus.ms.washington.edu [128.95.18.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA02301 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 1998 20:13:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wam@ms.washington.edu) Received: from hilbert1.ms.washington.edu (wam@hilbert1.ms.washington.edu [128.95.18.2]) by yunus.ms.washington.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id UAA03182; Sun, 16 Aug 1998 20:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 20:12:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Weinless To: Brandon Lockhart cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (no subject) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The fact that they have the same suffix does not require a great deal of perpescuity to determine. Thus the fact that they have the same core code is not a great surprise. The real question is have they evolved for different purposes i.e. netbsd geared towards networking apps? On Sat, 15 Aug 1998, Brandon Lockhart wrote: > :What is the relation between freebsd, openbsd and netbsd? > > They all have the same suffix? Good enough for you? Search the internet > for the three, and you will find out. I believe they are all focused on > the same core code, and just evolved in different ways. Kind of like good > and evil, cheech and chong, etc. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message