From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 02:10:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ABB106568B; Thu, 27 May 2010 02:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E14B8FC1F; Thu, 27 May 2010 02:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from philip.hq.rws (174.79.184.239) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Wed, 26 May 2010 19:10:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4BFDD47D.1080204@p6m7g8.com> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 02:10:05 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100220 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wesley Shields References: <201005261930.o4QJUjIr095703@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100526221248.GA8384@atarininja.org> <4BFD9FC1.8070207@p6m7g8.com> <20100527020719.GC8384@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20100527020719.GC8384@atarininja.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache20 Makefile ports/www/apache20/files patch-pcre.diff X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 02:10:11 -0000 On 05/27/10 02:07, Wesley Shields wrote: [...] > I don't mean to be an arm-chair critic here but I do have the interests > of ports users in mind when I say this... > > I haven't been following your changes but it seems to me that if there > is a lot of churn it may be prudent to slow down and allow time for > bugs to shake out before making more changes. [...] > Understood. I'd just like to see the least painful update path possible > for users. If modules must be recompiled we should bump them, regardless > of the chances of someone not making it through without rebuilding on > their own. I'm not requesting that this be done but it is something to > consider once the dust settles a bit, like you said. Yep, save wavelength. Let the settling begin! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.