Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Nov 2004 03:13:17 +0000
From:      Adrian Wontroba <aw1@stade.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ?
Message-ID:  <20041103031316.A95136@titus.hanley.stade.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <41856FAC.2020808@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au>; from carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au on Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:05:16AM %2B1100
References:  <02f201c4ba91$f9f95db0$33017f80@psique> <1098725440.5103.4.camel@sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu> <417D604D.4090800@jim-liesl.org> <20041028153756.GB1195@eucla.lemis.com> <41856FAC.2020808@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:05:16AM +1100, Carl Makin wrote:

> Do you want to yank it in 5 or 6-CURRENT?  There are a *lot* of people 
> using vinum and yanking it in 5-STABLE would force us all to use the 5.3 
> security branch until gvinum caught up.

>From my experiences today with setting up a very old machine[1] with
5.3-RC2, I think it would be best to keep both until gvinum had caught
up.  Vinum can do things which gvinum appears incapable of - such as
initialising a RAID-5 plex.

-- 
Adrian Wontroba
[1] A Fujitsu M700 4 way Ppro - the state of the art in 1997



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041103031316.A95136>