Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:23:41 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <code@apotheon.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs) Message-ID: <20110908212341.GA14481@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <4E68EF1E.9090803@FreeBSD.org> References: <4e65b42e.M5K%2Bto11vAdk/UTk%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4E6581E2.1060502@FreeBSD.org> <4e671817.ddHMkPbq9dJ7tLMz%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4E66EFC5.3020201@FreeBSD.org> <4e67a3b2.CVKcpQ8KQzuo8BP%2B%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4E67F41F.70401@FreeBSD.org> <4E680908.3060708@aldan.algebra.com> <20110908084205.GG13219@portland.byshenk.net> <4E68CE0D.2050000@aldan.algebra.com> <4E68EF1E.9090803@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:36:46PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 08.09.2011 16:15, schrieb Mikhail T.: >=20 > An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported in > the first place). Wait -- what? Why should something not be ported if it's not popular? --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk5pMl0ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXGrACg7tvRUuk25xYfdZZAb5pNHI1P UqAAnjkS6YkdkljRBSyB3FKMGkmLeziI =cM/S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110908212341.GA14481>