Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:43:19 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dirk Meyer <dinoex@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssl Makefile Message-ID: <20051004144319.GA71102@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200510040735.j947Z8rb069549@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200510040735.j947Z8rb069549@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 07:35:08AM +0000, Dirk Meyer wrote: > dinoex 2005-10-04 07:35:07 UTC >=20 > FreeBSD ports repository >=20 > Modified files: > security/openssl Makefile=20 > Log: > - bump SHLIB version > The API of openssl 0.9.8 ist compatible but not identical. > This version bump might break build of all ports that try > to include the opessl in base at the same time. > That ports should be fixed. This change should probably have waited until after 6.0. It's going to have significant follow-on effects that may prevent me from fixing security vulnerabilities in 6.0-RELEASE packages. Do you think this will not be the case? Kris --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDQpUHWry0BWjoQKURAjvhAKCiWNJgo5t+yh/rGSSmqxeqOEWUrACgxrwX 7QXiztZMyNzIZjeqVHrlF0U= =roxd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051004144319.GA71102>