Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:52:10 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: panic in ffs (Re: hangs in nbufkv)
Message-ID:  <20041012215210.GA78176@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <416C50C8.9010903@freebsd.org>
References:  <416AE7D7.3030502@murex.com> <200410112038.i9BKcCWt051290@apollo.backplane.com> <416C1B10.7030103@murex.com> <200410121818.i9CIIGRx092072@apollo.backplane.com> <20041012205105.GA76130@xor.obsecurity.org> <416C50C8.9010903@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:46:48PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:

> >FYI, I ran the package build cluster with 4:1 ratios for a few months
> >and did not have problems.  If there are major bugs there I would have
> >expected to come across them.
> >
> >Kris
>=20
> IIRC, the fragment allocation code in FFS allocates in terms of bits=20
> withing a byte, so anything that is 8:1 or less should work.

So I should try 16:1, or is that guaranteed to fail?

Kris

--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBbFIJWry0BWjoQKURAkPqAJ4g52yj+sTXwJ+jK3qWPomeNpFoNgCghIHs
l5v89XDuBhv1L6Gh+pjGe+Y=
=gzS7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041012215210.GA78176>