From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Fri Oct 20 15:56:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36475E39817 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb743@hermes.cam.ac.uk) Received: from ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0027080AA6 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb743@hermes.cam.ac.uk) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus Received: from sc1.bsdpad.com ([163.172.212.18]:11195) by ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:rb743) (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1e5Zes-000BAe-7o (Exim 4.89) (return-path ); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:56:26 +0100 Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:50:04 +0100 From: Ruslan Bukin To: Bret Ketchum Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PEBS support in hwpmc Message-ID: <20171020155004.GA54718@bsdpad.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: "R. Bukin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:56:29 -0000 I have not seen that yet. We are working on Intel PT support currently. But we plan to look at ARM v8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension technology too, which sounds similar to PEBS by Intel ? Ruslan On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:27:55AM -0500, Bret Ketchum wrote: > All, > > I apologize if there is a better forum for this question. Is there > any current effort to support Processor Event Based Sampling in hwpmc? > Without this support (or a VTune subscription) understanding > Front-End/Back-End bound applications running on Skylake/Kaby Lake > processors will be difficult at best. I'm thinking to simply add a > flag and either add a char to iap_event_descr or increase the size of > iap_evcode to house the sub-event (EVTSEL). Decoding and reporting the > captured PEBS records would need a bit more thought. > > Bret > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"