Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:32:48 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/rc.d Makefile Message-ID: <43A91330.2000704@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20051221080846.GA55142@ip.net.ua> References: <200512202056.jBKKuLQO034591@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051221080846.GA55142@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:56:21PM +0000, Doug Barton wrote:
>> dougb 2005-12-20 20:56:21 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6)
>> etc/rc.d Makefile
>> Log:
>> MFC 1.56, make install of sshd conditional on NO_OPENSSH
>>
>> Revision Changes Path
>> 1.53.2.4 +6 -1 src/etc/rc.d/Makefile
>>
> The full condition, to match the sources, would be:
>
> .if !defined(NO_CRYPT) && !defined(NO_OPENSSL) && !defined(NO_OPENSSH)
>
> That's how we get to compile secure/usr.sbin/sshd/.
Well, I wondered about that, but I didn't make the original change, so I
just MFC'ed what was there. If you want to update the Makefile in HEAD I've
no objection, or if you think it's really important, I'll be glad to do it
as well.
Personally, while I remember the support problems that not having all those
tests caused back in the day, I always thought that it was providing too big
a crutch. However, that's just grousing, and I've no objection to updating
rc.d/Makefile if you think we need to.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43A91330.2000704>