From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Dec 20 5:22:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8242B14A05 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 05:22:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA44500; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 08:22:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) From: Michael Lucas Message-Id: <199912201322.IAA44500@blackhelicopters.org> Subject: Re: Sys Admin article on Linux emulation In-Reply-To: <199912181557.HAA22996@netcom.com> from Stan Brown at "Dec 18, 1999 10:57: 0 am" To: stanb@netcom.com (Stan Brown) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 08:22:15 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > This months _Sy Admin_ magazine has a nice aritcle on Linux emulation > under FreeBSD. > > The author says he is running CURRENT> He rcomends several options to > be set in ones kernel config file. Are these option appropriate for a > machine runing STABLE? Uh, as the outhor, I *hope* I didn't say I'm running -current... if I did, it is a definite error and I should be taken out and shot. Those options are appropriate for stable. BTW, in the future, it would be a good idea to include the options in question in a query to the mailing list. You aren't always going to have someone on hand who has read the same third-party article you have, even when it's on the Web. Any if anyone still cares, the mysterious options are: options "P1003_1B" #POSIX infrastructure options "_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING" #Built-in POSIX priority scheduling options "_KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L" #POSIX version kernel is built for options SYSVSHM #System V shared memory options SYSVMSG #System V semaphores options SYSVSEM #System V messaging options USER_LDT #allow user-level control of i386 ldt My only complaint is the positioning of Tux and Beastie in the picture; if they had been reversed, the damn penguin would be getting a beakful of pitchfork. ;) Glad you liked it. ==ml To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message