From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 16:16:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD371065674; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: from fep28.mx.upcmail.net (fep28.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EF98FC20; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep19-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20110302155924.NNZR14354.viefep19-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:59:24 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.104] ([62.195.142.229]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id EFzK1g04H4xAGFy03FzL7k; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:59:24 +0100 X-SourceIP: 62.195.142.229 From: Koop Mast To: Andriy Gapon In-Reply-To: <4D6E6758.3050704@freebsd.org> References: <4D6E558B.5090706@freebsd.org> <1299078805.52738.15.camel@xenon> <1299079125.52738.16.camel@xenon> <4D6E6758.3050704@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:00:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1299081605.45274.32.camel@crashalot.rainbow-runner.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Nww7yNiXF4C1XGF+VcigPkOcTpD8wJaI1KQuZlH5eEk= c=1 sm=0 a=jAAJ84G5EhcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=WIhNvb9Eqd0gNC9oc-8A:9 a=nySfc6F-FEKKM-OipuzMegZiqhMA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Michal Varga , multimedia@freebsd.org, mkbosmans@gmail.com Subject: Re: pulseaudio: module.c: module-detect is deprecated: Please use module-udev-detect instead of module-detect! X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:16:10 -0000 On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 17:50 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 02/03/2011 17:18 Michal Varga said the following: > > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:13 +0100, Michal Varga wrote: > >> So instead of fixing things like these in ports, I'd say the issue > >> should be reported/fix submitted to upstream, it's pretty much possible > >> that they don't even know that there are systems that don't run evdev > >> (note that I don't mean it offensively, more like speaking generally > >> from experience, it simply happens). > >> > > > > Eh, I meant udev of course, I guess that's enough coffee for me today. > > That's possible, of course. Another possibility is that they think that > everything is Linux, or everything is like Linux, or they don't care about not Linux. > > I am all for contacting them, for sure. > Just want to point out that the proposed patch would not be against the nature of > the ports, because it doesn't affect functionality, but addresses OS differences. > I was planning on submitted some of our pulse patchs upstream. I will also submit this one as part of that. -Koop