Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 22:29:24 +0200 From: Matthias Petermann <matthias@d2ux.net> To: Darren Baginski <kickbsd@yandex.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bsdinstall to jail aborted (9.0-RELEASE-p3, amd64) Message-ID: <20120728222924.fd879867.matthias@d2ux.net> In-Reply-To: <170531343481888@web19g.yandex.ru> References: <20120728114643.ff0b536f.matthias@d2ux.net> <173631343481231@web3g.yandex.ru> <170531343481888@web19g.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Darren, thanks for diving into the issue. I looked through the mentioned places in the bsdinstall code and understand it now. On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:24:48 +0400 Darren Baginski <kickbsd@yandex.com> wrote: > I thing release/arch selection has to be a part of the installer, either directly or via environment variables. Yes, I think so too. I guess there usually no FTP directories created for patch level releases like 9.0-RELEASE-p3? Your proposal to introduce a new environment variable like TARGET makes sense. This could work like an override - when it is not set it can fall back to the default (using uname -r which makes sense for the installation media). Should I file a PR or did you already? Thanks, Matthias -- Matthias Petermann <matthias@d2ux.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120728222924.fd879867.matthias>