From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 16 21:14:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF0DC7A997 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 21:14:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 925A067B79 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 21:14:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id w126so60390069wme.0 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:14:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nognu-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DwVYM9C8TkIxQ+9ULdKneZCh+Du4jL/Tgbh/1IHAD3A=; b=kE2nqkQ3rxmHSIDzm94m0FHkqypVpV5BUNgWl2I0bDwh8VUbHYvoMYjNgoL8mzIHTd U3aDCe9o1dBtu+Gey1Noo3aIhbwO6ttuWwCFxkCuPcO6r5IYfGj0Wp80Be4rHiDP+ziZ o71SCSMTf1eLjf4JYFw4DXqA5t+RlnGkhgDs/nrjoBizSCQIurMGNKdx3OdiqpS6/fjE 1homojogLZ3UHQRnhqDA4kAg3TUnCIOgea1pO8sKnaMtIlH9y9jPKbftp/EEKPzlR8mZ cpzxaNXDWuW+FK/esjo/zdp2jCBPuIPh5z8Y60BG4LIfsRFgororkvtbS78Yw//4inL6 LkIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DwVYM9C8TkIxQ+9ULdKneZCh+Du4jL/Tgbh/1IHAD3A=; b=Sq7yLlpvi3rOgeBnqXjoet8GtvLcq+bRK7+ul3x2eTLA4vHYh498DskjR0UvMY8cXI BSUvNUPSGLiYiq8k01hqfRB2z40j9g0wIvDgmEl9XntQ69IZYmPXBw7349XHLAxODQWQ iCN5dpNlj4xURZMUyw3RkZOyiNMIy0gj9jFJ+3oBp+CVGNHBcs5HF8K+kaBQPysCRCqc Twj+/K8BvPWwX7n36lHuXmP0IhU/QB9Gq5NpjsMPps1JLyPmk0IdzqNgv0D2x+xLJgBj sQgP1ofZeoZr+EWcnqURgnd10T9f7ZzeyDsmG4dLVv8edhSBE+jgHaPS4PdGzyE2lXnv OsOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111iR8uTmCj/4UkCkFgSMbJVh8sRKB33d4X096PaL1Yk29Au4RDA 8NcQs5pz5gG2a1Jb X-Received: by 10.28.147.200 with SMTP id v191mr2404096wmd.95.1500239683896; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krenn.local ([2a02:908:e942:23c0:4c37:223b:f435:30e1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l73sm15855844wma.27.2017.07.16.14.14.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:14:41 +0200 From: Frank Steinborn To: "O. Hartmann" Cc: "Andrey V. Elsukov" , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Inter-VLAN routing on CURRENT: any known issues? Message-ID: <20170716211441.GA63054@krenn.local> Mail-Followup-To: "O. Hartmann" , "Andrey V. Elsukov" , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions References: <20170712214334.4fc97335@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <20170713211004.13492aef@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <20170716230514.0c2e5c65@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170716230514.0c2e5c65@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 21:14:46 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > I have not have any success on this and I must ask now, to not make a fool out of my > self, whether the concept of having several vlan over one single NIC is possible with > FreeBSD (12-CURRENT, as of today, r321055. > > Since it is even not possible to "route" from a non-tagged igb1 to a tagged vlan igb1.2 > or igb1.66 (for instance) on the same NIC, I have a faint suspect that I'm doing > something terribly wrong. > > I think everyone working with vlan should have those problems, but since I can not find > anything on the list, I must do something wrong - my simple conclusion. > > What is it? Do you have enabled net.inet.ip.forwarding?