From owner-freebsd-ports Sat May 12 20:11:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2D437B446 for ; Sat, 12 May 2001 20:11:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01CF10F40F; Sat, 12 May 2001 22:11:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <021c01c0db5a$6b946200$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Patrick Li" , References: <01b601c0db3c$5b02ba40$931576d8@inethouston.net> <002d01c0db41$70cdda30$0200a8c0@bsod> <01c201c0db57$7273c000$931576d8@inethouston.net> <004f01c0db59$9e6fe740$0200a8c0@bsod> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 22:11:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm on your side, but the people who are having problems accepting it are the people who can actually change it, so that's the current problem. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Li" To: "David W. Chapman Jr." ; Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 10:05 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > Hehe, people will accept it just like x11-toolkits/gtk12 and > x11-toolkits/gtk13. Between gtk12 and gtk13's pkg-descr, gtk13 gives a > warning that its unstable or a development version, but samba and > samba-devel pkg-descr is the exact same. On samba.org 2.2.x is already > pronounced stable, people would get confused as to why it is still > net/samba-devel (Just some crazy thoughts). > > Patrick Li > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David W. Chapman Jr." > To: "Patrick Li" ; > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 10:50 PM > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > > > > samba20 and samba22 has been proposed, byt some people are rejecting it. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Patrick Li" > > To: "David W. Chapman Jr." ; > > > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:12 PM > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > > > > > > > how about samba20 and samba22 and change description in pkg-descr to not > > > confuse people. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "David W. Chapman Jr." > > > To: "John Polstra" ; "Ade Lovett" > > > Cc: ; ; > > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:36 PM > > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > > > > > > > > > > So how do we have both ports exist without confusing people by keeping > > > samba > > > > 2.2.0 as samba devel, because I've gotten a few emails about people > > > > wondering about its stability. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message