From owner-cvs-all Wed Aug 1 7:25:13 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC5137B401; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 07:24:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EADAB3E28; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 07:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6C83C12B; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 07:24:53 -0700 (PDT) To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: "David E. O'Brien" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/sh mail.c In-Reply-To: <42763.996675456@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>; from sheldonh@starjuice.net on "Wed, 01 Aug 2001 16:17:36 +0200" Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 07:24:48 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010801142453.EADAB3E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sheldon Hearn writes: > On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 07:08:12 MST, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > Just to expand on this a little, the reason there was no warning is > > because gcc has a built-in for abort(3), so it already knows the > > prototype. I added the include files so that it would compile cleanly > > with -fno-builtin. > > Is there a good reason for us to omit -fno-builtin from the compiler > flags turned on in the WARNS case? Not that I know of. DES posted the patch to -arch some time back, and I don't recall seeing any objections. Ask him why he hasn't applied it yet. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message