Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 19:30:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: enlightenment@FreeBSD.org Subject: E on FreeBSD: [Bug 245594] devel/efl: Update to 1.23.3 Message-ID: <bug-245594-33756-dfEtui4Iqh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-245594-33756@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-245594-33756@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245594 --- Comment #41 from Peter TKATCHENKO <peter@flytrace.com> --- I finished updating the principal Enlightenment ports in my Github repo https://github.com/Peter2121/freebsd-ports : - devel/efl - x11-wm/enlightenment - x11/terminology - multimedia/rage Some enlightenment-related ports were removed: - x11-wm/e-module-alarm/ - x11-wm/e-module-cpu/ - x11-wm/e-module-deskshow/ - x11-wm/e-module-everything-places/ - x11-wm/e-module-mem/ - x11-wm/e-module-rmb/ - x11-wm/e-module-wlan/ - x11-wm/e-modules/ There is no reason to build internal modules separated from Enlightenment, = it is not supported in mainstream. Additional modules (if any) can be updated = by their developers. Some EFL ports still need tests/patches (editors/ecrire, graphics/ephoto). = I'm working on it. I hope to be able to add another EFL ports (devel/edi and sysutils/evisum) soon. Four principal ports work for me, I think that they can be committed 'as is= '. If I should do something more - please tell me. If not - please, commit the= m. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245594-33756-dfEtui4Iqh>