Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:50:17 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> To: mdf@freebsd.org Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r217369 - in head/sys: cam/scsi sys Message-ID: <20110114174719.D28159@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinh619WaGgq=5fFxTvEX0JPir34k8xb%2Bs6oSH8Y@mail.gmail.com> References: <201101131820.p0DIKXip059402@svn.freebsd.org> <AANLkTinh619WaGgq=5fFxTvEX0JPir34k8xb%2Bs6oSH8Y@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 mdf@freebsd.org wrote: > There appear to be 330 uses of SYSCTL and QUAD on the same line in > CURRENT. This seems reasonable to change them to S64, U64 and X64 so > they correctly reflect the size they operate upon. > > What do y'all think? Now I suggest delaying this until they can be renamed to a type- generic SYSCTL_INT() (would probably need to be spelled differently, SYSCTL_I() say, even if SYSCTL_INT() was changed at the same time). Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110114174719.D28159>