Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:29:50 -0500
From:      Eric <heli@mikestammer.com>
To:        Maxim Khitrov <mkhitrov@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: porteasy vs portupgrade
Message-ID:  <46A8BDEE.5080104@mikestammer.com>
In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750707260823s7a7de6e7k59ac18b5e1216d94@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <46A7E417.5040800@123.com.sv> <46A8144C.7010503@crackmonkey.us>	 <46A8B49C.6070903@123.com.sv> <46A8B301.7080903@mikestammer.com> <26ddd1750707260823s7a7de6e7k59ac18b5e1216d94@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> On 7/26/07, Eric <heli@mikestammer.com> wrote:
> 
> Do you simply use 'portmaster -a' to update everything? I've tried
> using it a few times, but it never recompiled ports that depend on the
> one being updated. I recall there was an option to do that, but you
> had to specify each port manually for that to work. How do you get it
> to update all out-of-date ports and recompile everything depending on
> those ports?

i usually just issue the -a switch. No issues yet in over a year of 
doing it that way. Why recompile everything that depends on a port 
unless you have to? things like this are usually in UPDATING, so i do it 
when i need to, not every time.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46A8BDEE.5080104>