From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Mar 10 17:21:02 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA06644
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 17:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA06639
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 17:20:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by nervosa.com (8.7.5/nervosa.com.2) with SMTP id RAA02080; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 17:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 17:18:35 -0800 (PST)
From: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>
To: Frank Durda IV <uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New kernel
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960310160305.1843A-100000@nervosa.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960310171755.1843D-100000@nervosa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 10 Mar 1996, invalid opcode wrote:

> How about PASSIVE instead of AGRESSIVE.
> == Chris Layne =============================================================

How about ASSERTIVE?

kernel: Would it be okay if I panic'ed now? (y/n)

== Chris Layne =============================================================
== coredump@nervosa.com ================ http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==