Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:48:28 -0500 (EST)
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
To:        Mark Crispin <MRC@Panda.COM>
Cc:        chat@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: /var/mail (was: re: Help, permission problems...)
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.95.961031154501.8545K-100000@quagmire.ki.net>
In-Reply-To: <MailManager.846762777.5917.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 31 Oct 1996, Mark Crispin wrote:

> Sigh.  Where does this nonsense about "touch" or editors or kernel mods comes
> from?
> 
> Let me try again, nice and simple.
> 
> 	/var/mail protected 775 and in group mail.
> 	All mail readers protected 2755 and in group mail.
> This is what some systems do when they don't want to grant world write.  More
> systems do this than use system call locking.  Many more.
>
	Wait, we were talking about 1777'd /var/mail, not 775...I don't
have the option with your software of setting /var/mail to 775..or do
I?

> For your information, there are sites which use imapd to access NFS-mounted
> spools.
>
	Sounds like that defeats the purpose (or, perceived purpose) of
IMAP...personally, I think that if 1777 is considered "appropriate" for
IMAP, there should also be a check to see if the spool is NFS-mounted and
give an error accordingly for that too...775 might be bad to you, but
NFS-mounted spools are worse IMHO...


Marc G. Fournier                                  scrappy@ki.net
Systems Administrator @ ki.net               scrappy@freebsd.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.961031154501.8545K-100000>