From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 16 22:43:01 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA24449 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 22:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from argus.nuke.net (pm3-p39.tfs.net [206.154.183.231]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA24437 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 22:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jbryant@localhost) by argus.nuke.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA04506; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 00:42:29 -0500 (CDT) From: Jim Bryant Message-Id: <199706170542.AAA04506@argus.nuke.net> Subject: Re: Distributed shared memory? To: ccsanady@friley01.res.iastate.edu (Chris Csanady) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 00:42:28 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Reply-To: jbryant@tfs.net In-Reply-To: <199706162138.QAA03561@friley01.res.iastate.edu> from "Chris Csanady" at Jun 16, 97 04:38:35 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply: > Could someone please point me at whatever is available > now? are you thinking of some kind of mach-like concept? it might be more efficient to simply use an UDP... Jim -- All opinions expressed are mine, if you | "I will not be pushed, stamped, think otherwise, then go jump into turbid | briefed, debriefed, indexed, or radioactive waters and yell WAHOO !!! | numbered!" - #1, "The Prisoner" jbryant@tfs.net - KC5VDJ 2M, 70cm, KPC-3+ - kc5vdj@wv0t.#neks.ks.usa.noam