Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:20:56 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install chapter.sgml Message-ID: <20061205152056.GM73470@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20061205135214.K72517@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <200612041443.kB4EhpBG035838@repoman.freebsd.org> <4574A587.3050903@FreeBSD.org> <20061205135214.K72517@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yr/DzoowOgTDcSCF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:53:54PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Doug Barton wrote: >=20 > DB> > Modified files: > DB> > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install chapter.sgml=20 > DB> > Log: > DB> > A class C network for 192.168.0.0/24 includes the address > DB> > range 192.168.0.0-192.168.0.255, not 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255 > DB> > =20 > DB> > Submitted by: Tom Van Looy <tom@ctors.net> > DB> > =20 > DB> > Revision Changes Path > DB> > 1.338 +1 -1 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install/c= hapter.sgml > DB> >=20 > DB> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/han= dbook/install/chapter.sgml.diff?&r1=3D1.337&r2=3D1.338&f=3Dh > DB> >=20 > DB>=20 > DB> In an ideal world, all references to Class [ABC] networks would > DB> disappear from our docs, and be replaced by their CIDR equivalents. >=20 > There are suprisingly small number of such places. What do you think abo= ut the=20 > patch attached? > --- books/handbook/install/chapter.sgml 4 Dec 2006 14:43:50 -0000 1.338 > +++ books/handbook/install/chapter.sgml 5 Dec 2006 10:53:35 -0000 > @@ -2356,7 +2356,7 @@ > =20 > <listitem> > <para>The address block being used for this local area > - network is a Class C block > + network is a (historical) Class C block > (<hostid role=3D"ipaddr">192.168.0.0</hostid> - > <hostid role=3D"ipaddr">192.168.0.255</hostid>). > The default netmask is for a Class C network Any reason we can't get rid of the mention of "class C" in both cases there? Something like: The address block being used for this local area network is 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 with a netmask of 255.255.255.0. Ceri --=20 That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --yr/DzoowOgTDcSCF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFdY5XocfcwTS3JF8RAoO0AKDBZq+51D00bprhgBVi4s3Yz7JLwACfVwXR Mlmub2fFc7PjVlZm7nTiCDQ= =UDWG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yr/DzoowOgTDcSCF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061205152056.GM73470>