Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 May 2014 21:35:57 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, Tim Bishop <tim-lists@bishnet.net>
Subject:   Re: Processor cores not properly detected/activated?
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmonXuwDy05ZBJKwqOijRTiN6e5bAEiUB8%2B_0R6%2Be_2NDbA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHNYxxPAqrRcJyxY8ZDnL87FdRAUxBL522nAAEQpA19uByYE2w@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20140524014713.GF13462@carrick-users.bishnet.net> <CAOtMX2gyeLYs4nAKOa-u=PQ63TakreG0CW_Fc%2BRrdDv8NtZ3XQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140524024231.GG13462@carrick-users.bishnet.net> <CAOtMX2hnQNhb%2BaGPogTMwxnVVKuuz3Buq1Cb3xBPYW7p7M8=Tw@mail.gmail.com> <20140524103835.GI13462@carrick-users.bishnet.net> <CAHNYxxPAqrRcJyxY8ZDnL87FdRAUxBL522nAAEQpA19uByYE2w@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Im about to start the process of creating a cpuid_t and peppering it
around the source tree.

Too many odd places use u_char as a cpuid and it's going to be limiting.


-a


On 27 May 2014 21:11, Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Tim Bishop <tim-lists@bishnet.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:03:12PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
>>> Yeah, I think so.  It seems like a GENERIC kernel ought to be able to
>>> handle the biggest commonly available quad socket systems.  Anything
>>> with more than 4 sockets, though, is probably too exotic to deserve
>>> such special treatment.
>>
>> I submitted a PR to that effect:
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190169
>>
>> Thanks again for your help.
>>
>> Tim.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I read in the follow-up of the PR that current hard limit is 256.
> Currently available systems* can already push usage up to 240. IVB-EX
> aka Xeon E7v2 supports 8-socket * 15-core * 2-thread. Expect something
> to break 256 in less than a year I think. X2APIC support will be
> required then. In theory it is already possible to build larger
> systems with custom glue logic, but I am not aware of any.
>
> *: E.g. IBM System x3950 X6
>
>
> -Jia-Shiun.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonXuwDy05ZBJKwqOijRTiN6e5bAEiUB8%2B_0R6%2Be_2NDbA>