From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Nov 17 19:10: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09C837B479 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id TAA83055; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:10:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200011180310.TAA83055@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: sanpei@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/22477: patchset for "X manpage" errors with XFree86-4 on bento Reply-To: sanpei@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/22477; it has been noted by GNATS. From: sanpei@FreeBSD.org To: k5@cheerful.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/22477: patchset for "X manpage" errors with XFree86-4 on bento Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 21:41:31 +0900 >Could you please take a look into more 33 unfixed ports? Sorry, I don't have enough time to commit these ports. By the way, I checked other ports. Some ports has MAINTAINER. I think we need to contact each MAINTAINER about your patch........ And all FUJISHIMA-san's patch files were created with unified format(-u option). But some patches in ports tree used context format(-c option). I need extra time to check this PR. Cheers. --- MIHIRA, Sanpei Yoshiro Yokohama, Japan. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message