Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:45:02 +0000
From:      "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com>
To:        Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: altq in main tree?
Message-ID:  <20040422094502.GA77611@sitetronics.com>
In-Reply-To: <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net>
References:  <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua> <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Max Laier <max@love2party.net> scribbled:
> On Wednesday 21 April 2004 11:48, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> > I just wonder if there are any chances that altq will be in the main
> > tree in the near future?
> 
> I work on altq integration on and off for a couple of weeks, yet the outcome 
> is unclear as the required locking for altq is not exactly easy to do. But as 
> vital locking is a must-do item for any new subsystem these days, we will 
> have to see how it works out.
> 
> Also there are some other items on my schedule which must be complete 
> beforehand.

If you have a TODO somewhere, I'd be willing to help out where I can.

> -- 
> Best regards,				| mlaier@freebsd.org
> Max Laier				| ICQ #67774661
> http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/	| mlaier@EFnet



-- 
Kind regards,

Devon H. O'Dell



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040422094502.GA77611>