Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:16:37 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inconsistency and bug with *chflags functions Message-ID: <20110118161637.GS2518@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20110118234350.R1077@besplex.bde.org> References: <AANLkTintj_eM=aRF4pO8PcT8VXvVJ=Booxag%2BwBg3gaX@mail.gmail.com> <20110118041447.GA2087@tops.skynet.lt> <20110118234350.R1077@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6QoWHXajryvO0ZWw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:18:08AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > The downcast in the call to setfflags() is safe, but the type puns given > by the wrong types in syscalls.master are not. I think the big-endian > 64-bit long case is the only case seriously broken by these puns, but > FreeBSD doesn't notice since it doesn't support any big-endian 64-bit > arches. Just a note, do you consider sparc64/mips64/powerpc64 unsupported ? --6QoWHXajryvO0ZWw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk01vOUACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4h45QCfYEnSzBwnyzODmxQF2/V1szut QZwAn1M7r6UCgz3mTmtNRXQB84iPHcuy =+lgk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6QoWHXajryvO0ZWw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110118161637.GS2518>