Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:07:50 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys sysctl.h src/sys/kern kern_sysctl.c Message-ID: <200207160907.g6G97o76029470@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpfzyk6714.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> ; from Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> "15 Jul 2002 23:00:23 %2B0200." References: <xzpfzyk6714.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > Thus requiring the semicolon in the invocation of FOO. This is much > > cleaner syntax and more consistent with expectations when writing > > function-like things in source. > > Yeah, it also unbreaks "smart" editors that do regexp-based syntax > highlighting and indentation. Thanks! The next horror to be unbroken is SYSINIT/SYSUNINIT; one requires the semicolon, the other does not. The macro nesting is deep too. M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207160907.g6G97o76029470>