From owner-cvs-all  Tue Jul 16  2:11: 8 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B3B8737B401; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 72C9B43E70; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org)
Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (uucp@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6G9AuvW010295;
	Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:10:57 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with UUCP id g6G9Auhf010294;
	Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:10:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: from grimreaper.grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6G97o76029470;
	Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:07:50 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org)
Message-Id: <200207160907.g6G97o76029470@grimreaper.grondar.org>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys sysctl.h src/sys/kern kern_sysctl.c 
References: <xzpfzyk6714.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 
In-Reply-To: <xzpfzyk6714.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> ; from Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>  "15 Jul 2002 23:00:23 +0200."
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:07:50 +0100
From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >   Thus requiring the semicolon in the invocation of FOO. This is much
> >   cleaner syntax and more consistent with expectations when writing
> >   function-like things in source.
> 
> Yeah, it also unbreaks "smart" editors that do regexp-based syntax
> highlighting and indentation.  Thanks!

The next horror to be unbroken is SYSINIT/SYSUNINIT; one requires the
semicolon, the other does not. The macro nesting is deep too.

M
-- 
o       Mark Murray
\_
O.\_    Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message