From owner-freebsd-ports Sat May 12 20:33:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958B337B423 for ; Sat, 12 May 2001 20:33:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9BD10F40F; Sat, 12 May 2001 22:33:31 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <023401c0db5d$7838be40$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Will Andrews" Cc: "Patrick Li" , References: <01b601c0db3c$5b02ba40$931576d8@inethouston.net> <002d01c0db41$70cdda30$0200a8c0@bsod> <01c201c0db57$7273c000$931576d8@inethouston.net> <004f01c0db59$9e6fe740$0200a8c0@bsod> <021c01c0db5a$6b946200$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010512222441.N29602@casimir.physics.purdue.edu> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 22:33:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org But its not in development anymore, its like calling XFree86-4, XFree86-4-devel. I wouldn't mind keeping up the -devel branch of samba for samba 3.0, but I currently can't do that without making 2.0.9 unavailable, which a few people still need access to. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Will Andrews" To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: "Patrick Li" ; Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 10:24 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:11:36PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > I'm on your side, but the people who are having problems accepting it are > > the people who can actually change it, so that's the current problem. > > FWIW, I think keeping "samba-devel" is a fine idea. People who can't be > bothered to make their own evaluation are stuck. > > Changing the name of the port for the sake of avoiding these people > sounds like a bad idea to me. > > -- > wca > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message