Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:24:52 +0100
From:      Adam J Richardson <fatman.uk@gmail.com>
To:        Eric <heli@mikestammer.com>
Cc:        Miguel <mmiranda@123.com.sv>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: porteasy vs portupgrade
Message-ID:  <46A8CAD4.3070804@crackmonkey.us>
In-Reply-To: <46A8B301.7080903@mikestammer.com>
References:  <46A7E417.5040800@123.com.sv> <46A8144C.7010503@crackmonkey.us>	<46A8B49C.6070903@123.com.sv> <46A8B301.7080903@mikestammer.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
<snip>

>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> try portmaster as a replacement to portupgrade. No dependencies and it 
> works great.

Hi Eric,

I tried portmaster one time when I got mad with portupgrade. It's great 
that it has no dependencies, but I didn't like it at all. Can't remember 
why - it just didn't work for me. I think portupgrade probably ruined me 
with things like portversion and pkg_deinstall. I'm too lazy for portmaster.

Adam J Richardson



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46A8CAD4.3070804>