Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 13:52:48 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Cc: terry@lambert.org, bde@zeta.org.au, core@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, kaleb@x.org, phk@critter.tfs.com, wollman@lcs.mit.edu Subject: Re: Locale stuff: call for conclusion. Message-ID: <199510192052.NAA03306@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Cny3gXmK34@ache.dialup.demos.ru> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Oct 19, 95 10:03:24 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >The problem is in shared library symbol overrride for other libraries. > >You have to make sure that even though there are identically named > >symbols, ALL the symbols come from only one or the other. > > Well, it is linker issue and can be solved (if not already solved) > after separation will be done. What happens if I link -lxpg4 > statically and left libc as dynamic? I haven't checked lately. My impression is that it would fail to operate as expected. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510192052.NAA03306>