Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Jul 2003 11:17:28 +0200
From:      Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz>
To:        Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: which FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <20030702091728.GK11229@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20030701162158.V84792@duey.wolves.k12.mo.us>
References:  <BAEALKMNKLEELDKGBICPIECJDDAA.dnewman@networktest.com> <20030701162158.V84792@duey.wolves.k12.mo.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us / 2003-07-01 16:36:02 -0500:
> > Software:
> > postfix, courier-imap, bind
> 
> Consider cyrus-imapd2 or cyrus-imapd22 instead of courier-imap.  Very
> reliable, very fast, and offers you the ability to create a "black
> box" mail appliance that does not require the use of local user
> accounts, if you wish to go that route.

    You seem to be implying that courier-imap requires user accounts in
    /etc/passwd, but that's not the case--as evidenced by the (very
    simple) postfix+courier-imap installation here.

    Plus, you get to avoid that SASL thhhhing (but not if you need SMTP
    auth in Postfix, in which case you could go for Cyrus just as well).

    Courier-IMAP has one disadvantage, though: it's GPL'd (Cyrus-IMAP is
    BSDL'd).

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030702091728.GK11229>