Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:14:37 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jason E. Hale" <jhale@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r306047 - in head/net-mgmt/arpscan: . files Message-ID: <20121018041437.GA43411@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1899853.OZWjZq66R9@mocha.verizon.net> References: <201210180142.q9I1gsfl012566@svn.freebsd.org> <20121018014452.GC42327@FreeBSD.org> <1899853.OZWjZq66R9@mocha.verizon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:06:45PM -0400, Jason E. Hale wrote:
> On Thursday, October 18, 2012 01:44:52 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Any specific reason to have LICENSE_FILE set for a standard license?
> >
> There are different types of BSD licenses; 2-clause, 3-clause, 4-clause. We
> don't provide any of them in ${PORTSDIR}/Templates/Licenses, so I think it is
> best to just specify the LICENSE_FILE for clarity.
Fair enough, thanks for clarification.
./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121018041437.GA43411>