Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:00:39 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r258672 - in head: . share/mk Message-ID: <20131127170039.2da15f21@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <52959276.7070803@wemm.org> References: <201311270454.rAR4sOqI004103@svn.freebsd.org> <20131127050358.GG1710@glenbarber.us> <52959276.7070803@wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 22:34:30 -0800 Peter Wemm wrote: > A slightly longer explanation of what I was thinking: > > - There's a new round of 'make -j' problems lurking in there. We are > missing chunks of the ordering glue that cause libraries to be built in the > right order when they depend on each other. > - It's a waste of cpu time for the usual case, particularly for the 11.x > cycle for the next 1-2 years. > - We don't build them properly - we invent cpu flags etc. > > The usual use case for 32 bit binaries seems to be: > - running a 32 bit chroot or jail - this is unaffected. > - running old binaries, usually from 4.x or 6.x when the 64 bit port was > really green - WITH_LIB32 doesn't actually help much with this because most > of the libraries are missing. Ugh, please revert this. You forgot about Wine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131127170039.2da15f21>