From owner-cvs-all Thu Jun 29 9:11:25 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FFA37BF5F; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:11:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e5TGB9C09080; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:11:09 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: John Baldwin , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files options src/sys/i386/conf NOT Message-ID: <20000629091109.L275@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <200006281721.KAA03683@john.baldwin.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from des@flood.ping.uio.no on Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 09:50:31AM +0200 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Dag-Erling Smorgrav [000629 00:50] wrote: > John Baldwin writes: > > On 28-Jun-00 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > I know. But in any case, you didn't specify *how* HTTPACCEPT fails to > > > work with HTTP 0.9. If it wakes the process up too early, no problem > > > (you're no worse off than without HTTPACCETPT). But if it never wakes > > > up the process (because it keeps waiting for more header lines), > > > that's not acceptable. > > It waits for a full HTTP/1.0 header, i.e. one including a blank line. > > Thus, it won't ever return the socket as ready if a server uses a 0.9 > > request.. > > Give me a D! Give me an O! Give me an S! What do you get? C'mon man you're the one that showed me how this stuff all works UTSL please. thanks, -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message