Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:09:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Lanny Baron <lnb@freedom.cybertouch.org>, cjclark@home.com, Paul Anderson <paul@geeky1.ebtech.net>, ulairi@jps.net, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907141608590.764-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990714160756.046fdbf0@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, Brett Glass wrote: > As I understand it, by Wes's criteria, this wouldn't count because Linux > itself came from the same CVS tree. Nope. Read: > >But it's still FreeBSD. Regardless of whether you buy the WC 4 disk set > >or the CheapBytes 1 disk set, you get the same kernel, the same configuration > >files, the same libraries, the same operating system. The same libraries, the same configuration files. As I already pointed out, they're not the same. The kernel is not the whole operating system. - alex I thought felt your touch In my car, on my clutch But I guess it's just someone who felt a lot like I remember you. - Translator To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907141608590.764-100000>