From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:12:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B777516A4CF; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:12:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.originative.co.uk (freebsd.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.249.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6D643D55; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:12:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@mx1.originative.co.uk) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.originative.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890D915560; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:12:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.originative.co.uk ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 95454-01; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:12:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mx1.originative.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 665D21556B; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:12:34 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:12:34 +0000 From: Paul Richards To: Warner Losh Message-ID: <20050106101233.GL16316@myrddin.originative.co.uk> References: <40695.1104961386@critter.freebsd.dk> <41DC60CD.8000802@wadham.ox.ac.uk> <20050105.145709.74659919.imp@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050105.145709.74659919.imp@harmony.village.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: jhb@freebsd.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: imp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 style.9 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:12:41 -0000 On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 02:57:09PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > phk>A harder problem is to detect when the copyright ends. > > End of the comment (or first blank line for those languages that don't > have block comments). Remember, my script grabs the entire license, > not just the copyright notice. You seem to have done a lot of these already, but if a total sweep of the tree to properly demarcate copyrights was going to be done then I think something more deterministic and useful for processing would have been better. Such as a Javadoc directive, XML container tag or something similar etc. That would move us a step along the way to being able to process our source files for a number of other reasons as well then. -- Paul Richards