From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 16:32:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A0716A4EC for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F5F43D2F for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xi@borderworlds.dk) Received: from ferengi.borderworlds.dk (ferengi.borderworlds.dk [80.166.152.7]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C865A5EE046 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:32:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from borg.borderworlds.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ferengi.borderworlds.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3E6B820 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:32:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by borg.borderworlds.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2D445B89D; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:32:41 +0200 (CEST) Sender: xi@borderworlds.dk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040621132006.2b1a296f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20040621172520.3544d6fe.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20040621214348.GB63857@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040621175626.3e762448.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <40D76DA3.9090809@mac.com> <20040621204111.6e684d45.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <40D79FF9.20308@mac.com> <20040622084726.524bfa39.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <3016.217.162.71.141.1087911989.squirrel@serv04.inetworx.ch> <20040622100825.01f0b258.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <40D8458D.1060500@zonnet.nl> <20040622105555.72a08502.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <86llifzlim.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> <20040622114322.440de5ef.wmoran@potentialtech.com> From: Christian Laursen Date: 22 Jun 2004 18:32:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040622114322.440de5ef.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Message-ID: <86d63rd046.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [OT] Re: What's the best possible email failover solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:56 -0000 Bill Moran writes: > Christian Laursen wrote: > [snip] > > > If you are running FreeBSD 5, you should be able to make a filesystem snapshot > > and rsync from there. > > I suppose I should have commented on that ;) > > We're not running FreeBSD 5 on these production machines yet ... but it's > likely we will be soon, so I'm considering using snapshots. > > To my understanding, we still have to stop Cyrus while the snapshot is > being created (to ensure consistency) but since a snapshot takes a lot > less time than an rsync, this should be a big improvement. Once the > snapshot is created, rsync can take as long as necessary. Actually it is not neccesary to stop Cyrus while the snapshot is created. If it tries to use the filesystem during that short period it will block until the snapshot is fully created. -- Christian Laursen