Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:19:12 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Jamie <jamie@gnulife.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: mntent.h creating problems - compiling gcc4
Message-ID:  <20061123011912.GB45406@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061122145124.B21681@floyd.gnulife.org>
References:  <20061122111131.U19707@floyd.gnulife.org> <20061122202041.GA40610@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061122145124.B21681@floyd.gnulife.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:05:04PM -0600, Jamie wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jamie wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >   Greetings!
> > >
> > >   I am having trouble compiling gcc 4.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.9. The compiler
> > > seems to be referencing mntent.h and the compilation fails with:
> > >
> > > from /usr/include/mntent.h:2,
> > >                  from ../../../gcc-4.0.3/libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:97:
> > > /usr/include/mntent.h:2:20: error: #include nested too deeply
> > >
> > >
> > >   I am compiling this with gcc 2.95 and gnu make 3.80.
> > >
> > >   Does anyone know why it's trying to include mntent.h? From what I've
> > > read, this is a system V header file, so I can't understand why . Are
> > > there any switches I should be passing to make?
> >
> > Why not use the FreeBSD port?
>=20
>=20
>   Because learning how to use some of the other tools outside the scope of
> the ports tree is kind of interesting, imho. I'd like to learn more about
> gcc and other tools for building software in FreeBSD, even if its just a
> purely academic pursuit.
>=20
>   I guess working on a layer lower than the ports collection adds some
> satisfaction to my curiousity.
>=20
>   There are those who use their cars solely for transportation, and others
> who enjoy restoring them/taking them apart/modifying them. I think the
> same kind of principles apply. Those just using their vehicles for
> transportation scratch their heads and wonder why anyone would have an
> interest in anything other than hassle free service.

OK, but your car has apparently caught caught fire, and you're
standing right next to a free bus stop :-)

Kris

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFZPcQWry0BWjoQKURAsHRAJ0eMVuI4932g3rsMhU4uPJd2eCKNwCeOw0h
rCzVaj3zOwjcOCPAp7AxFyc=
=wp2f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061123011912.GB45406>