From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 28 19:28:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB4EDC8 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B09F8FC0A for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TSYXE-00014U-8C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:28:40 +0100 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:28:36 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:28:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: Re: Why =?utf-8?b?UkVMRU5HXzk=?= branch is labeled as PRERELEASE and freebsd.org says FreeBSD is currently at 9.1-RC2 ? Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <508C7445.6080809@rawbw.com> <20121028151758.5f866bcb@davenulle.org> <508D7DF3.8080103@rawbw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:28:36 -0000 Yuri rawbw.com> writes: > > On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1 > > Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as "stable" 9.X branch, why then > 9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC? > This looks strange to me. > > Yuri http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1/sys/conf/newvers.sh?view=log Go back to Revision 227495, read log text, click View and scroll down to see TYPE="FreeBSD" 34 REVISION="9.0" BRANCH="PRERELEASE" Then back off and move the log up by repeating as above. Hopefully you understand his drill :-) jb