Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 02:17:27 +0100 From: Mark <admin@asarian-host.net> To: "Marcus Reid" <marcus@blazingdot.com>, "Mike Hogsett" <hogsett@csl.sri.com> Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability Message-ID: <200301030117.H031HZS41668@asarian-host.net> References: <200212170023.gBH0Nvlu000764@beast.csl.sri.com> <20030103000232.GA52181@blazingdot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Reid" <marcus@blazingdot.com> To: "Mike Hogsett" <hogsett@csl.sri.com> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:02 AM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability > I like to point people in the direction of: > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html > > The list is dominated by FreeBSD machines with > uptimes of longer than 1000 days. What is it that makes people rave about the longest uptime? To me, this is just a list of sites whose admins have neglected to perform the necessary upgrade-maintenances, seemingly for almost three years even. To me, this is just a list of potentially vulnerable sites. - Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301030117.H031HZS41668>