From owner-freebsd-libh Sat Oct 27 14:24:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from winston.freebsd.org (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753AA37B405; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 14:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.freebsd.org (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9RLNcw43066; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 14:23:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.freebsd.org) To: Josef Karthauser Cc: The Anarcat , "Simon L. Nielsen" , Eric Melville , binup@FreeBSD.ORG, libh@FreeBSD.ORG, Alexander Langer Subject: Re: current project steps In-Reply-To: Message from Josef Karthauser of "Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:01:57 BST." <20011027210157.D1534@tao.org.uk> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 14:23:38 -0700 Message-ID: <43062.1004217818@winston.freebsd.org> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > It sounds to me that libh has its fingers in too many pies. It's not a > clean API; and should be split into several, or rely on others. Hmmm. What was it someone said a few days ago about not presuming to dictact to others without also being willing to do the work or being, at a minimum, intimately familiar with the subject material? :-) Sit down, Joe, and let the libh people do what they need to do. You can critique it once it's a) finished or b) you start to make enough of a credible contribution yourself that can argue your architectural views from the standpoint of working code. Sorry if this seems a bit harsh, but the libh folks have been making great progress lately, after a long period of being completely stalled-out, and this is NOT the time for the peanut gallery to start piping up with steering corrections from the back seat unless it's also willing to walk up to the front and start rowing. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message