From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 7 05:27:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B8E9B73CD for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 05:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F6015F6 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 05:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by pfnn128 with SMTP id n128so58847496pfn.0 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 21:27:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6nKxTRLTPTZzE34x9sTMw94eAdLUBzaHbWAwEqZhsrQ=; b=vZ/fng96/SZhAhELbLmjAq+8evmd+qUHc9IzfjjysqmTz2uW69YtbT2B0Q305abXZT kd8v7VMOoWrk2fCpSjEwovuYYuQR+VdzoIUAH6tjmRJa86uU8Sz0gDN9pq4vC+ySeYl4 fGmvlbhiJMIN2kDvmMnMzPKn5kaUBZie5s0lvShvTzQDCEWTCbjgeV4xsF1OyD40PAdd fssmJtZSh4RA7cQ8qwH4YIMq4vkPc5b4rqRv6dqwReNPm4JmWNiEEq9oOtzmcxVZs7vp sD447EUvlAcJ84N2us9vJYA7KDDXuD0qhByDUtM61QGG5Oeiscp1Dd89VtOXC16+zo+t 9WJg== X-Received: by 10.98.70.138 with SMTP id o10mr40953940pfi.17.1449466057333; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 21:27:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.129] ([120.29.76.26]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 13sm31442428pfp.68.2015.12.06.21.27.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Dec 2015 21:27:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <566518C9.6010402@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 13:27:37 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kpneal@pobox.com CC: spellberg_robert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: release schedule , nines and tens References: <5664CD2C.2090207@emailrob.com> <20151207041519.GA62555@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: <20151207041519.GA62555@neutralgood.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 05:27:38 -0000 kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:05:00AM +0000, spellberg_robert wrote: >> a] does anyone know if decisions have been made regarding : >> >> 0] is 9.3 to be the last of the nines or >> is there a plan to release a 9.4 ? >> >> 1] is 10.3 to be the last of the tens or >> is there a plan to release a 10.4 ? >> >> b] if so , what are those decisions ? >> >> c] if not , is there a known or an estimated date for >> the making of the above_described decisions ? > > There's probably a better place to ask than this list. Try a the stable > list. Worst case use the email address on this page: > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/schedule.html > >> [ 10.2 was an emergency install that , probably , >> will not survive the release of 10.3 >> ] . > > I'm running 10.2 and I'm waiting to see if it survives a month without > crashing. I've got my 9.3-p14 filesystem ready to fall back on if I need > to. The list traffic I've seen regarding 10.2 does make me a little nervous. > It'll probably be fine, but, just in case... > I have been running 10.2 386 since it was first released with 20+ jails without any crashes. Been rock hard for me using jail.conf. I have no plans to go to 10.3, plan to go to 11.0 because the legacy rc.conf method of jail definition is suppose to be removed all together leaving only the new jail.conf method of jail definition which is far more flexible.