Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:09:43 +0200 From: Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com>, Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 19980921-BETA: more comments Message-ID: <19980923000943.A25792@rumba.enst.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809221628280.7544-100000@bright.fx.genx.net>; from Alfred Perlstein on Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 04:29:54PM -0500 References: <19980922193953.B24869@rumba.enst.fr> <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809221628280.7544-100000@bright.fx.genx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 04:29:54PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > uh :) that's because the packages are just pre-compiled binaries, most are > done in a.out to support 2.2.x, in fact i don't know of a ELF package made > so far. That I could understand, but I was talking about a bash I recompiled myself from the GNU archive, using 3.0 tools installed from the BETA distribution. Unless I missed something (which is quite possible), it seems to me it would be more logical to generate ELF binaries in a 3.0 installed from scratch. -- Pierre Beyssac pb@enst.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980923000943.A25792>