From owner-cvs-all Sat Dec 23 11: 1: 9 2000 From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 11:01:05 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF9337B400; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 11:01:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (Ipittythefoolthattrustsident@trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA33378; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 11:00:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eBNJ0ZG33447; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 11:00:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 11:00:34 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Andreas Klemm Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/apsfilter6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <20001223110034.B33365@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <200012231405.eBNE5DW72977@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001223062105.A9885@citusc.usc.edu> <20001223190306.A86928@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001223190306.A86928@titan.klemm.gtn.com>; from andreas@klemm.gtn.com on Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 07:03:06PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: obrien@NUXI.com Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 07:03:06PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > Why is this port named apsfilter6, not apsfilter according to the > > usual port naming conventions? > > its the same like with tcl, ghostscript and other ports. It is not the same. We have tcl/tk and ncftp named with version numbers so they can live side-by-side installed on the same machine. I don't think you're supporting having both aspfilter5 and aspfilter6 living side-by-side installed, are you? > apsfilter was the name I started with. Then I had to add a port > for apsfilter version 6. Both ports had to live in parallel for > a longer period. It made since when there were two ports living in parallel. That is not the case. Thus it would have been more typical of FreeBSD if you had upgraded the aspfilter port to version 6, and cvs rm'ed the aspfilter6 port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message