From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 14:00:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211931065674 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5B38FC15 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB8E0I7D003424 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:00:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB8E0IEl003418; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:00:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:00:18 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201012081400.oB8E0IEl003418@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Monthadar Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03901065674 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from red.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C019B8FC17 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB8Dp6ea021908 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 GMT (envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB8Dp6Js021907; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <201012081351.oB8Dp6Js021907@red.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:51:06 GMT From: Monthadar To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1 Cc: Subject: kern/152922: Routerstation Pro different flash model investigation X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:00:19 -0000 >Number: 152922 >Category: kern >Synopsis: Routerstation Pro different flash model investigation >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Dec 08 14:00:18 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Monthadar >Release: Current 201010 >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT-201010 FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT-201010 #2: Mon Dec 6 05:36:56 UTC 2010 root@FreeBSD.NFS:/usr/obj/mips/mips.mips/usr/src/sys/RSPRO mips >Description: It seems that RSPRO is using two different models of flash? My RSPRO have MX25L12805D, http://www.mxic.com.tw/QuickPlace/hq/PageLibrary482576EF002A2699.nsf/h_Index/30D2368B704F50B9482576EF002D070F/?OpenDocument&PartNo=MX25L12805D While Adrian refer to a different (newer mode?) flash model MX25L12845E? http://wiki.freebsd.org/AdrianChadd/UbiquityRouterstationPro Mine seems to be slower, Sector type of only 4KB and 64KB and bus width of x1. Do you think there will be problems with the driver because of compatibility issue or will it work good enough for both? >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: